"Has" the capacity is the operative word here. Ignoring that capacity would be foolish of us. This noise we hear has the capacity to speak our brains language > whether you want to admit this to yourself or not
On Jul 29, 7:49 pm, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > Their isn't many who can be trusted. They have shut their mouths with > greed or with the influence of fear. If their was people in academic, > medical or even government environs willing to open their mouths then > their would be a heck of a whole lot more talk about those thousands > upon thousands of chemtrails they have been spewing globally, > that have the capacity to induce Global Warming rather than blaming it > mostly > on coal and vehicle emissions and such. > > Whistleblowers? Come on Trev, get real. As huge as 9/11 was, not > many > whistleblowers crawled out of the woodwork on that farcade. > > Chemtrails, maybe their have been 100 reports news media wise that > have brought it up. Not many have dared to brooch it twice. > > Morgellons of specially prepared red and blue fibers or maybe even > they are a form of bacteria - out of site out of mind news media wise > of maybe a dozen > > You have specially prepared cells, bacterial light triggers and > plain > > > hypotheses- all strung together. > > I am not the one who is stringing them together, your academic world > is doing that for us. > > They didn't reach the capacity to make this Noise we hear go around > the world > without a lot of closed back door meetings occuring of covert black > ops > programs that must go back 10-20 yrs of experiments and testing. All > behind > the backs of the unsuspecting public worldwide. > > Too many of us hear a machine code within that noise of our Hum. > > This noise we hear has the capacity to speak our brains language > whether > you want to admit this to yourself or not, like an RF field of pulses. > > That is the simple truth. > > On Jul 29, 4:55 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > @Dees' We shouldn't be shutting the gate before the cart of trying to > > close doors > > of possibilitys. They are designing tools as we speak to enable them > > to write on our brains as well as erase memorys. > > > I don't suggest closing doors is ever a good idea in intellectual > > areas- but because some process is being examined, or could be > > misused ,doesn't make it as 'fait accompli'- so suspicions aren't > > enough. > > You speak as if there are no people in acedemia ,medical or even > > government environs that can be trusted at any level. > > There are rules and whistle blowers and now the internet to help open > > the doors in a responsible way. > > Without clear evidence, you will have to keep your investigative > > enthusiasm in check - though there's nothing wrong in highlighting > > areas of scientific enquiry, as you do well. > > It's not possible to say if any could be used in Hum generation, > > being disadvantaged on the full picture equally with you, it's got to > > be left to a rigourous exposition or better still, smoking gun report. > > You have specially prepared cells, bacterial light triggers and plain > > hypotheses- all strung together. > > I can't become a microbiologist in order to refute your claims as to > > what 'might' be attainable. > > I think Hum is much more 'down to earth' tbh. > > > On Jul 29, 2:52 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Here's a newer one concerning possible writing of sensations. More > > > than a feeling: sensation from cortical stimulation > > > Kristina J Nielsen and Edward M Callaway > > > The authors are in the Systems Neurobiology Laboratories, The Salk > > > Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La > > > Jolla, California 92037, > > > > Changes in neuronal firing underlie sensation, but how many neurons > > > are needed to perceive these activity shifts? Two new studies in > > > Nature suggest that the experimental modulation of only a few neurons > > > can influence perception. > > > >http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2629494&too... > > > > Our governments love to probe of National Institute of Health > > > (NIH) . > > > > Microstimulation was pioneered more than 100 years ago by Fritsch and > > > Hitzig, who studied the consequences of stimulating different brain > > > regions in dogs > > > > Fritsch G, Hitzig E. Arch Anat Physiol Med Wiss . 1870:300–332. > > > > Furthermore, the combination of targeted stimulation of some neurons > > > with the selective inactivation of downstream neurons, perhaps using > > > the light-gated chloride pump triggered by longer wavelength light, > > > might provide insight into which neurons are necessary, as well as > > > sufficient, for the generation of behavioral biases. > > > > cortical microstimulation, a technique in which neural activity is > > > manipulated by passing electrical current into the brain > > > > So maybe its possible the noise we hear of static is a possible > > > manipulation of the electrical impulses in our brains? Electrical > > > current is not to far off.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
