Here's a newer one concerning possible writing of sensations. More than a feeling: sensation from cortical stimulation Kristina J Nielsen and Edward M Callaway The authors are in the Systems Neurobiology Laboratories, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037,
Changes in neuronal firing underlie sensation, but how many neurons are needed to perceive these activity shifts? Two new studies in Nature suggest that the experimental modulation of only a few neurons can influence perception. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2629494&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract Our governments love to probe of National Institute of Health (NIH) . Microstimulation was pioneered more than 100 years ago by Fritsch and Hitzig, who studied the consequences of stimulating different brain regions in dogs Fritsch G, Hitzig E. Arch Anat Physiol Med Wiss . 1870:300–332. Furthermore, the combination of targeted stimulation of some neurons with the selective inactivation of downstream neurons, perhaps using the light-gated chloride pump triggered by longer wavelength light, might provide insight into which neurons are necessary, as well as sufficient, for the generation of behavioral biases. cortical microstimulation, a technique in which neural activity is manipulated by passing electrical current into the brain So maybe its possible the noise we hear of static is a possible manipulation of the electrical impulses in our brains? Electrical current is not to far off. Peace On Jul 28, 10:11 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > Optical switching of prepared cells is nothing digital. Another misuse > of the term. > Most (if not all ) of more complex trials involve the subject being in > an MRI scanner for evaluation of effects on brain regions and done > with volunteers. No one is 'writing' to brains. > Switching one prepared cell in a worm etc. is not quite mind control. > Yes, It's a worrying trait in research, with abuse possible -but not > in everyday usage any more than Hum needs to be Morse code to remain a > nusiance. > Just because something could happen doesn't mean it has already - or > is going to soon. > > On Jul 27, 10:23 pm, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Trev Our brain process's data. It's as simple as that.THAT IS > > VERIFIABLE > > The truth is most of us are intuitely aware of the sound, BUT WE DO > > NOT CONSCIOUSLY know without a shadow of a doubt which of our senses > > is doing the perceiving. We do not know exactly which of our brain > > neurotransmitters is being stimulated. The truth is our brains > > cannot perceive anything without their being some form of a stimuli > > outside the body that our brains recognize of a an action that > > generates any one or more of our sensory modalilty of sensations. > > (chain reactions) > > > Sensory Modality (sense organs) - a type of physical phenomenon that > > can be sensed, such as temperature and sound > > > Physiology - Any of the various types of sensation,, the sensory > > modalities will be visual, auditory, tactile, olfactory, gustatory, > > kinesthetic, etc. > > > In Cognitive Neuroscience - a condition in which the stimulation of > > one sensory modality gives rise to an experience in another modality. > > > Modality (semiotics) - the types of sign and the extent to which any > > set of signs is real or unreal. Refers to a certain type of > > information and/or the representation > > > SENSORY MODALITIES - Those are our brains interfaces that process data > > and that includes ANY TYPE OF MACHINE CODE THAT USES A COMMON > > LANGUAGE OF ALPHA NUMERIC CHARACTERS FROM SIMPLE REPRESENTATONS TO > > COMPLEX REPRESENTATIONS. > > > Interface - The noun interface has been around since the 1880s, > > meaning “a surface forming a common boundary, as between bodies or > > regions.” > > > Every interface implies a structure. Electrical signals are made up of > > voltage levels, frequencies and duration. > > Every interface implies a function, electronic signals activate > > functions; > > > Software interfaces (programming interfaces) are the languages, codes > > and messages that programs use to communicate > > > No matter what they're called, interfaces boil down to a format and > > language that defines the services one system is capable of delivering > > to another. > > > MACHINE CODE IS NOT ONLY FOR COMPUTER PROGRAMMING. > > Language and grammer is machine code > > Math is machine code > > Representations of pictures, signs, symbols is machine code > > Braille is machine code. > > Morse code is machine code > > Vibrational energy is machine code > > Pulsed energy is machine code > > SOUND CAN BE MADE TO BE AN INTERFACE THAT IS CAPABLE OF DELIVERING A > > FORMAT OF A LANGUAGE THAT OUR SENSORY MODALITIES > > ACCEPT > > > Frequency and duration > > > You might want to take a deeper look into the advancing technology of > > COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE. That part of science has been demonstrating > > for quite a long time they have the knowledge of how to interface with > > our brain waves. > > > If you want demonstrations, all you got to do is follow the money > > trail for your > > knowledge. > > > And as you have said on many numerous occasions, technology wise, > > they > > are 10-20 years advanced on a multitude of science that they release > > to us, > > the public. > > > HERE IS A NEW YORK TIMES ARTICLE THAT IS TELLING US HOW THEY > > ARE DEMONSTRATING THE DIGITAL NATURE OF BRAIN WAVES, OPTICAL > > EXCITATION INTERFACING WITH THE BRAINS FUNCTIONS AND ABILITY TO > > MIMIC THE ELECTRICAL CHATTERINGS OF OUR BRAINS. > > >http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/14/science/14brai.html? > > > What is new here is that for the first time, researchers can perturb > > specific neuron types using light, Dr. Deisseroth said. > > > "We can start to sort of speak the language of the brain using > > optical excitation," Dr. Deisseroth said. The brain's > > functions "arise from the orchestrated participation of all the > > different cell types, like in a symphony," he said. > > > One of the newest, fastest strategies co-opts a photosensitive > > protein called channelrhodopsin- 2 from pond scum to allow precise > > laser control of the altered cells on a millisecond timescale. That > > speed mimics the natural electrical chatterings of the brain, said > > Dr. Karl Deisseroth, an assistant professor of bioengineering at > > Stanford. > > > Laser stimulation can serve as a musical conductor, manipulating > > the various kinds of neurons in the brain to reveal which important > > roles they play. > > This light-switch technology promises to accelerate scientists' > > efforts in mapping which clusters of the brain's 100 billion neurons > > warble to each other when a person, for example, recalls a memory or > > learns a skill. > > ------------------------------------- > > No matter what they're called, interfaces boil down to a format and > > language that defines the services one system is capable of delivering > > to another. > > > On Jul 25, 9:39 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I think you're pushing the vernacular a bit far out here, Dee. > > > Machine code is for computer type interfaces and totally digital. > > > No one has yet demonstrated the digital nature of brain waves to my > > > knowledge! > > > The whole hum thing seems to trigger analogue reactions, in fact! > > > Only the on/off nature of hum could be remotely construed as digital > > > and 'there, not there' is just a switching state- not info or control, > > > unless there is an actual machine in the brain waiting to receive it > > > with pre-programmed parameters.[Similar to low bandwidth sub comms] > > > Where has that been shown in the human brain -or alternatively > > > implants discovered that are verifiable? > > > > On Jul 23, 8:36 pm, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Trev Our brains machine code is language/grammer, thinking in > > > > pictures and math and sound. If they know the machine code of the > > > > brain chatterings, then they know > > > > it's common language. Transmission comes in many forms. One of them > > > > could > > > > be the noise we suffer of the Hum. > > > > > On Jul 22, 2:45 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Dee, I appreciate your strength of conviction , but I'm not wrong. > > > > > You take me too literally. > > > > > Communication can take many forms, but it still needs a 'common > > > > > language'. > > > > > Let's say a sender and receiver then.OK? > > > > > My gut feeling about malign control is all it can be -a sense of how > > > > > it fits into the current diaspora.[Nice word]. > > > > > If you know more , then you must increase your ability to transmit > > > > > this info/perspective across and catch the interest of many > > > > > disinterested people-most of whom can't even be bothered to vote, > > > > > remember, let alone worry too much about their fellow citizens, or a > > > > > common future overmuch! > > > > > Sad to say- but this is also a current 'truth' - and it measures > > > > > against small bands of dissidents or sufferers that comprise > > > > > opposition to the status quo. > > > > > > I agree that infra sound technology misused is highly malign, but I do > > > > > have a hope , apart from 'cock-up' pulling it down, after so many > > > > > years of mis-application, that there is a higher balance in the > > > > > universe that has given strengths to those who oppose evil. > > > > > This would be also endemic in our genetic makeup and Yes!, may even > > > > > result in Hum sensitivity. > > > > > > The 'language' for such topic discourse is also very difficult to > > > > > access, but I hope you get my drift. > > > > > > On Jul 22, 7:05 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Trev Your wrong. Language does not rely on both a speaker and a > > > > > > hearer. Language can be written like a deaf person reads sign > > > > > > language. Our brains understand pictures as well as math. Language/ > > > > > > grammer is becoming known as an innate (inbred) behavior in our DNA > > > > > > and not a learned behavior. This noise we hear could very well be > > > > > > speaking > > > > > > to our brains subliminal, in this reality that we all are living. I > > > > > > don't think it would take > > > > > > as much TO FORCE A MALIGN INFLUENCE. That's why they call it > > > > > > subliminal perhaps. > > > > > > > On Jul 21, 2:23 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Language relies on both speaker and hearer believing in the same > > > > > > > reality. > > > > > > > This is how conjurors work their magic by taking control of the > > > > > > > interaction - but there is NO dialogue as such.. > > > > > > > Suspended disbelief and it is not far from fuzzy logic imo. > > > > > > > Fuzzy logic is needed where the constaints are too far out of > > > > > > > kilter > > > > > > > with known ideas but some really new concepts are needed. > > > > > > > I think that, Dee is where your vision operates and why I persist > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > struggle with what you see. > > > > > > > I know what it's like when I've seen something others don't- the > > > > > > > dialogue is non existent ,in truth, and a lonely path it can be > > > > > > > too. > > > > > > > As already said, I was technically 'trained' but no educated > > > > > > > enough to > > > > > > > really put my ideas into an acceptable framework. When I came to > > > > > > > work > > > > > > > in research finally, with multiple PhDs, I found them great > > > > > > > intellectually, but most of their eyes glazed when moving away > > > > > > > from a > > > > > > > comfort zone of pre- assuptions and formal > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
