Their isn't many who can be trusted. They have shut their mouths with greed or with the influence of fear. If their was people in academic, medical or even government environs willing to open their mouths then their would be a heck of a whole lot more talk about those thousands upon thousands of chemtrails they have been spewing globally, that have the capacity to induce Global Warming rather than blaming it mostly on coal and vehicle emissions and such.
Whistleblowers? Come on Trev, get real. As huge as 9/11 was, not many whistleblowers crawled out of the woodwork on that farcade. Chemtrails, maybe their have been 100 reports news media wise that have brought it up. Not many have dared to brooch it twice. Morgellons of specially prepared red and blue fibers or maybe even they are a form of bacteria - out of site out of mind news media wise of maybe a dozen You have specially prepared cells, bacterial light triggers and plain > hypotheses- all strung together. I am not the one who is stringing them together, your academic world is doing that for us. They didn't reach the capacity to make this Noise we hear go around the world without a lot of closed back door meetings occuring of covert black ops programs that must go back 10-20 yrs of experiments and testing. All behind the backs of the unsuspecting public worldwide. Too many of us hear a machine code within that noise of our Hum. This noise we hear has the capacity to speak our brains language whether you want to admit this to yourself or not, like an RF field of pulses. That is the simple truth. On Jul 29, 4:55 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > @Dees' We shouldn't be shutting the gate before the cart of trying to > close doors > of possibilitys. They are designing tools as we speak to enable them > to write on our brains as well as erase memorys. > > I don't suggest closing doors is ever a good idea in intellectual > areas- but because some process is being examined, or could be > misused ,doesn't make it as 'fait accompli'- so suspicions aren't > enough. > You speak as if there are no people in acedemia ,medical or even > government environs that can be trusted at any level. > There are rules and whistle blowers and now the internet to help open > the doors in a responsible way. > Without clear evidence, you will have to keep your investigative > enthusiasm in check - though there's nothing wrong in highlighting > areas of scientific enquiry, as you do well. > It's not possible to say if any could be used in Hum generation, > being disadvantaged on the full picture equally with you, it's got to > be left to a rigourous exposition or better still, smoking gun report. > You have specially prepared cells, bacterial light triggers and plain > hypotheses- all strung together. > I can't become a microbiologist in order to refute your claims as to > what 'might' be attainable. > I think Hum is much more 'down to earth' tbh. > > On Jul 29, 2:52 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Here's a newer one concerning possible writing of sensations. More > > than a feeling: sensation from cortical stimulation > > Kristina J Nielsen and Edward M Callaway > > The authors are in the Systems Neurobiology Laboratories, The Salk > > Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La > > Jolla, California 92037, > > > Changes in neuronal firing underlie sensation, but how many neurons > > are needed to perceive these activity shifts? Two new studies in > > Nature suggest that the experimental modulation of only a few neurons > > can influence perception. > > >http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2629494&too... > > > Our governments love to probe of National Institute of Health > > (NIH) . > > > Microstimulation was pioneered more than 100 years ago by Fritsch and > > Hitzig, who studied the consequences of stimulating different brain > > regions in dogs > > > Fritsch G, Hitzig E. Arch Anat Physiol Med Wiss . 1870:300–332. > > > Furthermore, the combination of targeted stimulation of some neurons > > with the selective inactivation of downstream neurons, perhaps using > > the light-gated chloride pump triggered by longer wavelength light, > > might provide insight into which neurons are necessary, as well as > > sufficient, for the generation of behavioral biases. > > > cortical microstimulation, a technique in which neural activity is > > manipulated by passing electrical current into the brain > > > So maybe its possible the noise we hear of static is a possible > > manipulation of the electrical impulses in our brains? Electrical > > current is not to far off.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
