Trev Our brain process's data. It's as simple as that.THAT IS VERIFIABLE The truth is most of us are intuitely aware of the sound, BUT WE DO NOT CONSCIOUSLY know without a shadow of a doubt which of our senses is doing the perceiving. We do not know exactly which of our brain neurotransmitters is being stimulated. The truth is our brains cannot perceive anything without their being some form of a stimuli outside the body that our brains recognize of a an action that generates any one or more of our sensory modalilty of sensations. (chain reactions)
Sensory Modality (sense organs) - a type of physical phenomenon that can be sensed, such as temperature and sound Physiology - Any of the various types of sensation,, the sensory modalities will be visual, auditory, tactile, olfactory, gustatory, kinesthetic, etc. In Cognitive Neuroscience - a condition in which the stimulation of one sensory modality gives rise to an experience in another modality. Modality (semiotics) - the types of sign and the extent to which any set of signs is real or unreal. Refers to a certain type of information and/or the representation SENSORY MODALITIES - Those are our brains interfaces that process data and that includes ANY TYPE OF MACHINE CODE THAT USES A COMMON LANGUAGE OF ALPHA NUMERIC CHARACTERS FROM SIMPLE REPRESENTATONS TO COMPLEX REPRESENTATIONS. Interface - The noun interface has been around since the 1880s, meaning “a surface forming a common boundary, as between bodies or regions.” Every interface implies a structure. Electrical signals are made up of voltage levels, frequencies and duration. Every interface implies a function, electronic signals activate functions; Software interfaces (programming interfaces) are the languages, codes and messages that programs use to communicate No matter what they're called, interfaces boil down to a format and language that defines the services one system is capable of delivering to another. MACHINE CODE IS NOT ONLY FOR COMPUTER PROGRAMMING. Language and grammer is machine code Math is machine code Representations of pictures, signs, symbols is machine code Braille is machine code. Morse code is machine code Vibrational energy is machine code Pulsed energy is machine code SOUND CAN BE MADE TO BE AN INTERFACE THAT IS CAPABLE OF DELIVERING A FORMAT OF A LANGUAGE THAT OUR SENSORY MODALITIES ACCEPT Frequency and duration You might want to take a deeper look into the advancing technology of COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE. That part of science has been demonstrating for quite a long time they have the knowledge of how to interface with our brain waves. If you want demonstrations, all you got to do is follow the money trail for your knowledge. And as you have said on many numerous occasions, technology wise, they are 10-20 years advanced on a multitude of science that they release to us, the public. HERE IS A NEW YORK TIMES ARTICLE THAT IS TELLING US HOW THEY ARE DEMONSTRATING THE DIGITAL NATURE OF BRAIN WAVES, OPTICAL EXCITATION INTERFACING WITH THE BRAINS FUNCTIONS AND ABILITY TO MIMIC THE ELECTRICAL CHATTERINGS OF OUR BRAINS. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/14/science/14brai.html? What is new here is that for the first time, researchers can perturb specific neuron types using light, Dr. Deisseroth said. "We can start to sort of speak the language of the brain using optical excitation," Dr. Deisseroth said. The brain's functions "arise from the orchestrated participation of all the different cell types, like in a symphony," he said. One of the newest, fastest strategies co-opts a photosensitive protein called channelrhodopsin- 2 from pond scum to allow precise laser control of the altered cells on a millisecond timescale. That speed mimics the natural electrical chatterings of the brain, said Dr. Karl Deisseroth, an assistant professor of bioengineering at Stanford. Laser stimulation can serve as a musical conductor, manipulating the various kinds of neurons in the brain to reveal which important roles they play. This light-switch technology promises to accelerate scientists' efforts in mapping which clusters of the brain's 100 billion neurons warble to each other when a person, for example, recalls a memory or learns a skill. ------------------------------------- No matter what they're called, interfaces boil down to a format and language that defines the services one system is capable of delivering to another. On Jul 25, 9:39 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > I think you're pushing the vernacular a bit far out here, Dee. > Machine code is for computer type interfaces and totally digital. > No one has yet demonstrated the digital nature of brain waves to my > knowledge! > The whole hum thing seems to trigger analogue reactions, in fact! > Only the on/off nature of hum could be remotely construed as digital > and 'there, not there' is just a switching state- not info or control, > unless there is an actual machine in the brain waiting to receive it > with pre-programmed parameters.[Similar to low bandwidth sub comms] > Where has that been shown in the human brain -or alternatively > implants discovered that are verifiable? > > On Jul 23, 8:36 pm, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Trev Our brains machine code is language/grammer, thinking in > > pictures and math and sound. If they know the machine code of the > > brain chatterings, then they know > > it's common language. Transmission comes in many forms. One of them > > could > > be the noise we suffer of the Hum. > > > On Jul 22, 2:45 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Dee, I appreciate your strength of conviction , but I'm not wrong. > > > You take me too literally. > > > Communication can take many forms, but it still needs a 'common > > > language'. > > > Let's say a sender and receiver then.OK? > > > My gut feeling about malign control is all it can be -a sense of how > > > it fits into the current diaspora.[Nice word]. > > > If you know more , then you must increase your ability to transmit > > > this info/perspective across and catch the interest of many > > > disinterested people-most of whom can't even be bothered to vote, > > > remember, let alone worry too much about their fellow citizens, or a > > > common future overmuch! > > > Sad to say- but this is also a current 'truth' - and it measures > > > against small bands of dissidents or sufferers that comprise > > > opposition to the status quo. > > > > I agree that infra sound technology misused is highly malign, but I do > > > have a hope , apart from 'cock-up' pulling it down, after so many > > > years of mis-application, that there is a higher balance in the > > > universe that has given strengths to those who oppose evil. > > > This would be also endemic in our genetic makeup and Yes!, may even > > > result in Hum sensitivity. > > > > The 'language' for such topic discourse is also very difficult to > > > access, but I hope you get my drift. > > > > On Jul 22, 7:05 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Trev Your wrong. Language does not rely on both a speaker and a > > > > hearer. Language can be written like a deaf person reads sign > > > > language. Our brains understand pictures as well as math. Language/ > > > > grammer is becoming known as an innate (inbred) behavior in our DNA > > > > and not a learned behavior. This noise we hear could very well be > > > > speaking > > > > to our brains subliminal, in this reality that we all are living. I > > > > don't think it would take > > > > as much TO FORCE A MALIGN INFLUENCE. That's why they call it > > > > subliminal perhaps. > > > > > On Jul 21, 2:23 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Language relies on both speaker and hearer believing in the same > > > > > reality. > > > > > This is how conjurors work their magic by taking control of the > > > > > interaction - but there is NO dialogue as such.. > > > > > Suspended disbelief and it is not far from fuzzy logic imo. > > > > > Fuzzy logic is needed where the constaints are too far out of kilter > > > > > with known ideas but some really new concepts are needed. > > > > > I think that, Dee is where your vision operates and why I persist to > > > > > struggle with what you see. > > > > > I know what it's like when I've seen something others don't- the > > > > > dialogue is non existent ,in truth, and a lonely path it can be too. > > > > > As already said, I was technically 'trained' but no educated enough to > > > > > really put my ideas into an acceptable framework. When I came to work > > > > > in research finally, with multiple PhDs, I found them great > > > > > intellectually, but most of their eyes glazed when moving away from a > > > > > comfort zone of pre- assuptions and formal report writing concepts. > > > > > The only true free mind was a guy writing a book on quantum physics > > > > > which updated Einstein- and though he sent me a copy years later, I > > > > > could barely scrape through the first chapter- the rest was, and still > > > > > is, gobbledegook as we say here! > > > > > Crop circles fall somewhere in between these margins, the possible > > > > > genuine ones, at least promising new fuzzy logic ideas which ,by their > > > > > nature, will seem odd or meaningless to everyday rules > > > > > The false flag stuff [spoofed CCs] comes under conjuring tricks where > > > > > the controllers [conjurors] have the upper hand and the fear of the > > > > > new stops people taught only one 'official' language of what is > > > > > permissible from stepping outside the box. This generates fear and > > > > > confusion instead of insight, as intended. > > > > > This is where CCs and Hum live alongside each other- but in order to > > > > > communicate, you must find a common language or face a lone path. > > > > > > My initial answer to your view on 'Alice CC' is that it is fair > > > > > comment that 3D is even more impressive than 2D- but what we need is a > > > > > handle on 4D, which is what you're probably thinking about, when > > > > > looking into your outer reality. > > > > > Time flows, but only by reference to the 3D world of seeing and energy > > > > > constructs we accept. > > > > > To dis-integrate this reality would indeed take plenty of fuzzy logic > > > > > party tricks by God [should you believe, otherwise- cosmic truth] and > > > > > a few others beside , I reckon ! > > > > > > My broad view is that it would take too much to support a malign > > > > > influence theory and 'cock up' would be order of the day. > > > > > 9/11 aftermath does show that we can't be complacent though, about > > > > > what is going on under our very noses! > > > > > > On Jul 19, 11:21 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > A language within a lang? A source code? Their are c's, a plus > > > > > > symbol > > > > > > that looks like it's in parenthesis.Plus symbol inside circle, > > > > > > maybe a > > > > > > new metacharacter? Again I am just a layperson, but I do get around > > > > > > research wise. The lang: operator, which restricts by programming > > > > > > language (e.g., lang:"c++", -lang:java, or lang:^(c|c#|c\+\+)$) > > > > > > >http://www.google.com/intl/en/help/faq_codesearch.html > > > > > > What kind of code are you crawling? > > > > > > > 2. What regexp syntax does Code Search support? > > > > > > > Google Code Search supports POSIX extended regular expression > > > > > > syntax, > > > > > > excluding backreferences, collating elements, and collation classes. > > > > > > To search for a space character, escape it with a backslash, as in > > > > > > hello,\ world. You can search for literal strings by enclosing the > > > > > > strings in quotation marks, as in "hello, world". > > > > > > > We also support the following Perl extensions > > > > > > > \d Matches a digit character. > > > > > > \D Matches a non-digit character > > > > > > \s Matches a whitespace character > > > > > > \S Matches a non-whitespace character > > > > > > \w Matches a word character. (alphanumeric plus "_") > > > > > > \W Matches a non-word character > > > > > > > I noticed a number of D or d type characters in the crop circle, > > > > > > as > > > > > > well as > > > > > > s or S 's embedded in the parenthesis of some form. The diagonal > > > > > > lines of hash > > > > > > mark lines in the parenthesis, a form of W's ? > > > > > > > Or the plus symbol is a metacharacter asterisk form? > > > > > > each of the operators can be used as a negative by placing a minus > > > > > > sign ("-") in front of it. > > > > > > > :-: make the dots bigger and there could be a minus symbol > > > > > > inbetween. > > > > > > > It wasn't my intention to jump this far outside the box, but the > > > > > > crop circle image > > > > > > brought a number of meanings to mind. I see other notation type > > > > > > symbols > > > > > > within it as well. I also see some form of a question mark in the > > > > > > other side > > > > > > of the parenthesis. > > > > > > > :-: Symbols can be broadened like BOLD then tilted like Italics > > > > > > and then > > > > > > they can press it all together and re etch it into different > > > > > > morphs of > > > > > > different seemingly random broad/thin shapes within shapes. > > > > > > > Most probably not what your eyes see, but that is what my eyes > > > > > > see > > > > > > within that crop circle. Different multi tech levels of machine > > > > > > code > > > > > > meanings. > > > > > > > I see a language within a language of some form. > > > > > > > I realize this meaning of mine is probably far reaching for you and > > > > > > probably too far outside of the box, within your concepts of putting > > > > > > forth theorys that if the technology is not proven or taught in any > > > > > > schools that we, as a group, > > > > > > shouldn't think too much about those type of musing of theory's. > > > > > > By now, I would imagine, they have gotten pretty advanced on their > > > > > > so called String Theory's? But you won't find those answers being > > > > > > taught anywhere > > > > > > probably either. > > > > > > > And this noise we hear, that seems to be some form of a > > > > > > synchronization > > > > > > as it swings it's way around the world, well it didn't get here on > > > > > > it's own. And it's > > > > > > traveling through different layers of matter. Some days I muse, it > > > > > > almost seems > > > > > > like a perputual machine of sorts or possibly a perputual virtual > > > > > > machine perhaps > > > > > > that links us into this noise we hear. Perhaps a machine that > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
