In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 07/19/2005 at 10:48 AM, David Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Also: the Windows code would likely have to be stripped out. Which Windows code? The "for Windows" version, which didn't include[1] any windoze code, or the full function version, which did. FWIW, I've never wanted to run winapps on my OS/2 system. >But the Workplace Shell was an interesting hack, Yes! I'd love to see an equivalent in Linux. [1] That WINOS2 would run windoze 3.1 applications if you had an existing copy of windoze. The name was confusing because it was the package of choice for those that did *not* want to run windoze applications. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html