In <db9405830909102240xade49f9o9adc503905547...@mail.gmail.com>, on
09/11/2009
at 03:40 PM, Wayne Bickerdike <wayn...@gmail.com> said:
>So many times have novices asked me why their REXX was failing and it was
>sequence numbers in 73-80. Can still happen for VB 255
No; for RECFM=VB the sequence numbers are on the left. However, the RENUM
command used to be BAD for unnumbered RECFM=VB. Have they fixed it to
shift the data right 8 columns before plugging in sequence numbers?
>It should be 133 anyway, makes coding for my 1403 line printer a cinch
>:)
Why not 145 for the 1443 or 242 for the 3800?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
