> -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- > Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[email protected]] För Paul Gilmartin > Skickat: den 11 september 2009 01:42 > Till: [email protected] > Ämne: Re: CLIST/REXX Library Formats > > On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:44:12 -0500, Rick Fochtman wrote: > > >I'm involved in a discussion (read "argument") with co-workers where > >I'm currently doing a consulting gig. > > > >Which is more effieient for CLIST/REXX libraries? the choices are > >"RECFM=FB, LRECL=255" or "RECFM=FB,LRECL=80"? > > > >I lean toward the VB-format, btt I have at least one person here > >insisting that FB/80 is a "Industry standard" and is absolutely > >mandatory. The libraries are NOT LLA/VLF managed. > > > >Opinions and/or criticisms, please. > > > o First, silicon is cheaper than carbon. The criterion > for "more efficient" should consider the cost of human > resources, before computer resources. >
<SNIP> Somewhat OT: I have the experience that VB files (lrecl>1000 at least) have *much* worse prestanda than FB files in the ISPF editor. Anyone with the same or other experience ? (Is that because of bad coding by IBM or what ?) Regards, Thomas Berg __________________________________________ Thomas Berg Specialist IT-U SWEDBANK ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
