Sp 226 -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Peter Relson Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 10:06 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: SRBEPA
>There is not much of a real difference. SQA will even overflow into CSA. It is a matter of "definition". Also the manual says to use SQA. In addition, SQA is >automatically page-fixed. I don't know why you'd want executable code in [E]SQA vice [E]CSA. >http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/iea2a890/6.3.4 The thread is primarily about the SRB routine. The reference is about the SRB itself. The SRB must be in (E)SQA; it must not be in (E)CSA. >So for the SRB control block 241, No, never. Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
