In <1331312434.77887.yahoomailclas...@web125406.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>, on 03/09/2012 at 09:00 AM, Juan Mautalen <jgmauta...@yahoo.com.ar> said:
>We currently have our VTAMLST libraries protected with UACC(READ). >IBM suggests UACC(NONE) for them Why? >Human users are not my problem, Why not? Anybody who might be asked to diagnose a network issue potentially needs access. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN