On Tuesday, 10/10/2006 at 04:08 GMT, Dave Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The original issue was whether panel logic by itself could be considered a > programming language, given that it lacks certain basics (such as iterative > logic). IMO the answer is yes, but I'm sure others would not agree. To me, > just because something doesn't have everything doesn't mean it isn't a > programming language. It might not be a 'good' language, but that doesn't > mean it isn't a language.
I haven't been paying close attention to this thread, sorry. Did anyone look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programming_language? As you say, the completeness or robustness of the language is not the issue. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
