Sure. True quick-and-dirties. My product supports DD overrides using the typical "second parameter" convention. I have an assembler program to exercise that feature. It consists of a LINK macro and a few DCs. Reentrance would be overkill.
Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 7:59 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Is the teaching of non-reentrant HLASM coding practices ever defensible? John P Baker wrote: > I always -try- to write reentrant code. However, I sometimes find that a > non-reentrant coding technique is a more suitable approach. > Could you please describe such a situation? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
