Steve Samson wrote:
Um, Steve, "reenterable" was the original word circa 1964.
Interesting. I didn't know that. I joined IBM in 1968
and I seem to recall reentrant being the common tongue
then and reenterable used later.
-Steve Comstock
Some IBM
dockie circa 1970 thought that that looked too complex and found the
word "reentrant" in a dictionary. Unfortunately, he or she did not read
the definition. "Reentrant" meant a closed curve that had at least one
concave segment, i.e. it re-entered itself. "Reenterable" means a
program that is capable of being re-entered without compromising data
integrity. The -able suffix is the essence of the word.
A program that is re-entrant according to the strict definition is one
that spontaneously re-enters itself. We call such behavior a loop.
/<rant>
Steve Comstock<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Well, when you are learning Assembler, the work to write reentrant
(I, too, prefer that term to the relatively new-fangled
"reenterable") can get in the way of focusing on simply how the
instructions work and how to string together series of instructions
to accomplish specific tasks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
