> I'm sure Bob Richards remembers "The Chairbreaker"! :-) I'm trying to forget! <grin>
Bob -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 4:18 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: HMC Management Best Practices That's true, until you get an operator that's too lazy tocrack open a manual, whether to look up a message or try and learn something new, and he's also too **** gutless to accept any responsibilities. And a management team that's too soft-hearted (or soft-headed) to do anything about it. BTDTGTSS! I'm sure Bob Richards remembers "The Chairbreaker"! :-) Edward Jaffe wrote: > Tom Marchant wrote: > >> It should be no surprise that with a philosophy of removing >> responsibility >> from operators that they would act irresponsibly. My experience is that >> operators who are treated with respect and given responsibility do good >> work. Attempts to make a shop "operator-proof" don't work as well, IMO. >> > > > Exactly. The deeper the bench, the better the team. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
