It would be worth looking at the RMF report on the crypto processing and seeing if they are running hot. Does the PAGENT address space a lot of CPU - is it delayed? The code may execute on your CICS TCB - executing cross memory (via PC) in the TCPIP address space(s). I don't recall seeing anything about tuning the number of threads in TCPIP for crypto work. There are some counts for crypto activity in the SMF 30 records. Colin
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 at 05:10, Peter <dbajava...@gmail.com> wrote: > After implementing ATTLS there is some delay in our CICS transaction but I > was suspecting if sn absence of crypto processor can overload the general > processor to cause this delay ? > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024, 9:01 AM Phil Smith III <li...@akphs.com> wrote: > > > Peter wrote: > > >I have a general question here. When you don't have crypto processor, So > > >when a ATTLS traffic is enabled does the encryption and decryption > handled > > >by Started task TCPIP or the general processor? > > > > The TCPIP started task is just code and runs on the general processor, so > > your question doesn't make much sense. AT-TLS is managed > > by the Policy Agent started task, and it appears that the actual > > encryption takes place in the TCPIP started task, but that's a > > conclusion-I've never wondered. > > > > Why do you ask? What problem are you trying to solve? We'd like to know > > more! > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
