On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:41:12 -0400, Dave Salt wrote: > >SimpList can be added to that list as well. One reason is because many >developers want to try SimpList by installing it in their own private >libraries, and they don't have access to SMP/E. > Shame on IBM for transmogrifying SMP/E into a product that presents an ineffable threat to system integrity, and for tolerating that situation, apparently indefinitely! Prior to that all programmers had access to SMP/E and could install products for trial in their own private libraries.
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:35:49 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote: > >IMO, well-implemented SMP/E packaging is preferable to non-SMP/E. > >However, non-SMP/E packaging is far preferable to poorly implemented >SMP/E packaging. Getting it right is difficult and some vendors do a very >poor job of it. IMO if a vendor doesn't do their SMP/E packaging correctly, >it is better that they not bother. > Where can I find some Rules of Thumb; an SMP/E style checker? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
