> Tom Marchant said: > AFAIK, Innovation (FDR, etc.) still ships their products without SMP/E, and > their installation is (IMO) one of the best. IIRC, Quickref is another that > is > not installed with SMP/E.
SimpList can be added to that list as well. One reason is because many developers want to try SimpList by installing it in their own private libraries, and they don't have access to SMP/E. Dave Salt SimpList(tm) - try it; you'll get it! http://www.mackinney.com/products/program-development/simplist.html > Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:35:49 -0500 > From: m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com > Subject: Re: BLKSIZE=3120 > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:16:00 -0700, Duffy Nightingale wrote: > > >we send our product out using TSO XMIT. Which gives rise to a > >question. I saw some techie state that he would not install a > >product unless he could use SMP/E. Is this something us developers > >should explore or is it a big headache that is not worth it? > > IMO, well-implemented SMP/E packaging is preferable to non-SMP/E. > > However, non-SMP/E packaging is far preferable to poorly implemented > SMP/E packaging. Getting it right is difficult and some vendors do a very > poor job of it. IMO if a vendor doesn't do their SMP/E packaging correctly, > it is better that they not bother. > > AFAIK, Innovation (FDR, etc.) still ships their products without SMP/E, and > their installation is (IMO) one of the best. IIRC, Quickref is another that > is > not installed with SMP/E. > > -- > Tom Marchant > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
