On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 14:59:15 -0500, Ed Gould wrote: > >This is in my opinion a fuzzy error. Where the C issue is a classic >bug(probably) your SR Policy is a gray area and it is harder to >define a right/wrong answer (although probably you are right). >Spelling & such is a issue but not a real bug. It is a soft issue, in >my opinion and a lot harder to get IBM interested. > I certainly did not say that my "SR Policy" thread was motivated by the response to a report of a spelling error. In fact, it was a report of the misbehavior I discussed in the "Buffering: stdout ..." thread. I suppose you're free to deem it cosmetic or not as you choose.
The good news is that IBM has reproduced the problem, even while prodding me for a statement of business impact (which I supplied, acknowledging that I was working on a PoC). -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
