On Friday, 07/18/2008 at 01:45 EDT, Thomas Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since PCOMM is one of the few extras that my client has chosen to buy, I > > am happy to live with THAT requirement for the availability of ALMCOPY. I > f > it were provided only with a refresh of PCOMM (at whatever the next > maintenance level might be), that's fine. > > I would not expect the PCOMM developers to develop extra utilities for > > other vendor's terminal emulation programs. If I have to use the free > x3270, I will just have to live with the limited features of IND$FILE. Bu > t > extra features for PCOMM are more than welcome.
Then I would suggest opening requirements against PCOMM to supply such a utility. (They currently supply ZipPrint and CMMOUSE.) Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
