>>> On 4/5/2010 at 04:51 PM, "Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)" <terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov> wrote: > Yes this is correct "Probably running into a limitation on the number of > UCBs in a single z/OS LPAR."
If you're thinking you need to define a new HiperSocket triplet to z/OS for each Linux guest added to your z/VM LPAR, that's not correct. Mark Post
