Sure, I'd recommend reviewing the EXEC before using it. There is a small configuration section, which SHOULD be all you need to modify.
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. ________________________________ From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:42 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Applying Maintenance - Best Practice ty again. May I have a copy of your FLASH2ND EXEC? "Frank M. Ramaekers" <framaek...@ailife.com> Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> 09/24/2010 10:38 AM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: Applying Maintenance - Best Practice I think the answer to your question is yes? I assume, that any problem discovered are not insurmountable that they have to be backed out (instead additional fixes may need to be applied). This is correct. From my FLASH2ND EXEC: /*--------------------------------------------------------------------*/ /* FLASH2ND - FLASHCOPYs the 1st level VM DASD */ /* */ /* 1) Verify all flash drives are available (!._rDest variable) */ /* 2) Show a confirmation list of source & destination drives */ /* 3) FLASHCOPY CP_OWNED drives and rename destination drives */ /* 4) Create a copy of current direct and modify for 2nd level */ /* (2USER DIRECT) changing CP_OWNED volumes and updating the */ /* 2nd level directory (Uses F123 as 123 for DIRECTXA). */ /* (This also places a copy of this new directory source on */ /* second level MAINT's 191 disk, this MAINT's F191 disk.) */ /* 5) Modify the SYSTEM CONFIG modfying the CP_OWNED volumes */ /* */ /* Note: This can also be used to make a backup of the system for */ /* quick recovery (this set of DASD is IPL w/o change). */ /*--------------------------------------------------------------------*/ Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. ________________________________ From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:32 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Applying Maintenance - Best Practice ty for sharing this. One question though: It is ok to apply the maintenance to the production system, Level 1, your 1st step, as long as you do not run PUT2PROD at that time there? Also I noticed you do not use the SYSTEM CONFIGURATION parm disk fallback, but just point to the FLASH COPIED disks if there is a problem. "Frank M. Ramaekers" <framaek...@ailife.com> Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> 09/24/2010 10:26 AM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: Applying Maintenance - Best Practice Here's what I do: 1) Apply Maintenance to production system 2) Flash production DASD to test packs (using different naming conventions) Actually, I have a REXX program I wrote that not only changes the name, but updates the SYSTEM CONFIG, directory and updates the directory on the test packs. 3) Bring up the 2nd level VM 4) Run PUT2PROD on 2nd level 5) Test 2nd level If satisfied with the testing: 1) Flash production DASD to backup packs (can be the same as the test packs, again using a different naming convention) 2) PUT2PROD on the production system 3) IPL the updated system 4) Any problems, I can immediately IPL the "backup" system (copy prior to PUT2PROD) Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. ________________________________ From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:02 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Applying Maintenance - Best Practice Is there a procedure for applying maintenance selectively such that a full system backup is not necessary beforehand? In other words, save the old CPLOAD and just point to the new CPLOAD at IPL and if need be simply fallback to the old CPLOAD. I know the CF1 Parm Disk backup supports this. But is there a way of applying maintenance so that it hits only a new CPLOAD and not the current CPLOAD. Perhaps the answer is to save the current CPLOAD in the CF1 Parm Disk configuration before applying the maintenance. It is probably not "best practice", but is there such a procedure of avoiding a full system backup before putting on any maintenance, or is that taboo? Marcy Cortes <marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com> Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> 09/23/2010 04:00 PM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: Applying Maintenance - Best Practice We put it on 2nd level first. Check that it IPLs, basically... not a lot we can do there. Then our vm test lpar. Make sure everything comes up. Maybe start a Linux there. Then our 2 Linux test/dev lpars, which run lots of servers. Gets a lot of exercise there. Let it cook a few weeks. Roll to the 6 production LPARs, starting usually with the 2 that don't run Linux. Then 2 Linux on a weekend and the other 2 on another weekend. We have the z196 maint with RSU 1002 on all of test dev now (3 lpars). On both a z196 and a z10. All is well, YMMV;) Marcy ________________________________ From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 10:58 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Applying Maintenance - Best Practice I suppose RSU maintenance gets burned-in at Level 2, whereas COR maintenance goes right in to Level 1. But , what bout PSP COR? Level 1 or Level 2. Scott Rohling <scott.rohl...@gmail.com> Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> 09/23/2010 10:58 AM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: Applying Maintenance - Best Practice I'd say it depends on the purpose of your 2nd level system. Do what you would normally do when applying maintenance... do you put it on 1st or 2nd level first? If your 2nd level system is meant to be a z/VM 'test' system, then it seems like you're already committed to that level of effort. Scott Rohling On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 8:30 AM, George Henke/NYLIC <george_he...@newyorklife.com <mailto:george_he...@newyorklife.com> > wrote: Would you recommend putting this 5.4 zEnterprise compatibility maintenance on at Level 1 or Level 2. We currently have both environments for 5.4. I suppose the quickest and easiest (maybe dirtiest too?) way is just to put it on at Level 1 and fall back to CPOLD if there is a problem. "Best practice" may call for putting it on at Level 2 first, but the nature of the change may not warrant that level of effort. There are, however, 45 or more prereq fixes also going on with these 2 APARs, VM64879 VM64881. Just interested in what everyone thinks. Marcy Cortes <marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com < <mailto:george_he...@newyorklife.com> mailto:marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com> > Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU < <mailto:marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com> mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> > 09/22/2010 11:01 AM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU < <mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> > To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU < <mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> cc Subject Re: What is the z/VM 5.4 Compatibility PTF for z196? Also you want to check PSP on IBMLink and look for 2817DEVICE and see what recent stuff is needed for that system type (or whatever one you are installing). ________________________________ From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU < <mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> ] On Behalf Of Bruce Hayden Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 7:27 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU < <mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> Subject: Re: [IBMVM] What is the z/VM 5.4 Compatibility PTF for z196? Look at the page <mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> http://www.vm.ibm.com/service/vmreqze.html for the complete list of z/VM APARS for the zEnterprise. On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:07 AM, George Henke/NYLIC <george_he...@newyorklife.com> wrote: Marcy, Thank you for this information. Do you happen to know what PTF is needed to run z/VM 5.4 on the z196. We will probably take your advice. We will probably bring up the z196 with 5.4 first and then move 6.1 up to Level 1 afterwards. -- Bruce Hayden z/VM and Linux on System z ATS IBM, Endicott, NY < <http://www.vm.ibm.com/service/vmreqze.html> http://www.vm.ibm.com/service/vmreqze.html> <http://www.vm.ibm.com/service/vmreqze.html> _____________________________________________________ This message contains information which is privileged and confidential and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify us at privacy...@ailife.com. _____________________________________________________ This message contains information which is privileged and confidential and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify us at privacy...@ailife.com. _____________________________________________________ This message contains information which is privileged and confidential and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify us at privacy...@ailife.com.
