> -----Original Message----- > From: John R. Levine [mailto:jo...@iecc.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 10:45 AM > To: Murray S. Kucherawy > Cc: DKIM List > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations > after signing > > > I think if it becomes well-known that users of MUA 1 are easier to phish > > than users of MUA 2, a lot of people will gravitate to the safer > > implementation, don't you? I sure would. > > Aw, come on. How many millions of people still use Outlook Express on > Windows XP? Switching MUAs is painful, people rarely do it.
...meaning MUA developers won't bother to do something about it once the attack is plainly visible and they're used as examples, because since users won't switch anyway, there's no motivation? _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
