>>>>> Well, if you want to introduce semantic changes why not just change >>>>> the meaning of h=from:to: to be semantically identical to >>>>> h=from:from:to:to: ... >>> I assumed that the proposal applied only to headers rfc5322 says cannot be >>> duplicated. >> >> That is a constraint that was not stated. > > It is now.
This probably requires a substantive change to the specification. I'm not clear whether it would force the spec to re-cycle at Proposed. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
