On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 06:07:15AM -0700, Dave CROCKER allegedly wrote: > > > On 10/18/2010 3:31 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote: > > --On 15 October 2010 11:53:51 -0400 Dave CROCKER<d...@dcrocker.net> wrote: > >> On 10/15/2010 11:40 AM, Mark Delany wrote: > >>> Well, if you want to introduce semantic changes why not just change > >>> the meaning of h=from:to: to be semantically identical to > >>> h=from:from:to:to: > >> > >> This would mean that it is /never/ ok to add a listed header field after > >> signing. Adding would /always/ break the signature. > > > > I assumed that the proposal applied only to headers rfc5322 says cannot be > > duplicated. > > That is a constraint that was not stated.
It is now. Mark. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
