> Of course you have every right to discuss any decision on the mailing list, > and even dispute it for that matter. However, I hope you realise that it is > difficult to cater to every demand on this list. For example, it took me > nearly two hours to prepare the minutes that you describe as too terse, and
Sigh. You misunderstand my point. Meeting minutes are generally terse, and not more elaborate than what you have been making them. I really appreciate your efforts in this regard since, historically in ILUGD, reporting comprehensive minutes of meetings have often been overlooked. My point is not that we have more elaborate minutes. It is more that sometimes when we would need more information on a particular point of the meeting, it is ok for us to ask about it on the list. Also, if we would like to discuss a particular point of the meeting, it is ok for us to discuss it on list. Note that I am not saying that it is obligatory for anybody present to answer these queries. I am only saying that we are not rebuffed with a canned "you should have been at the meeting" answer. - Sandip _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
