> > >> Let us not undermine somebody's effort. It takes a lot to think out of > the > >> box. > >> I'm pretty sure if the Chaudharys did this for European languages they > >> would > >> have got a lot more than they have it now. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org > >> http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd > >> Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi > >> http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/ > >> > > >
Gora has said correctly. English is the language of a few, he has already given figures. I, being from literature side, have seen the the concerns of Enlish speaking people are quite different from those of Indian languages. Its unfortunate that we have to settle with English as we have almost killed Sanskrit. But the Hindi we use today is not the actual form. The way Hebrew came to life again we should rather work on Sanskrit. Which has strong roots in our glorious past and a lot of valuavle text is available in Sanskrit. Even NASA scientists say that Sanskrit is the best language for computers as well as AI. "There is at least one language, Sanskrit, which for the duration of almost 1000 years was a living spoken language with a considerable literature of its own. Besides works of literary value, there was a long philosophical and grammatical tradition that has continued to exist with undiminished vigor until the present century. Among the accomplishments of the grammarians can be reckoned a method for paraphrasing Sanskrit in a manner that is identical not only in essence but in form with current work in Artificial Intelligence. This article demonstrates that a natural language can serve as an artificial language also, and that much work in AI has been reinventing a wheel millenia old." "The comparison of the analyses shows that the Sanskrit sentence when rendered into triples matches the analysis arrived at through the application of computer processing. That is surprising, because the form of the Sanskrit sentence is radically different from that of the English. For comparison, the Sanskrit sentence is given here: Maitrah: sauhardyat Devadattaya odanam ghate agnina pacati." http://www.gosai.com/science/sanskrit-nasa.html Swapnil _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
