On Thu, October 2, 2008 1:02 am, Sandip Bhattacharya said:
> On Thursday 02 October 2008 00:55:21 Atanu Datta wrote:
>>
>> All GNU documentation, including that of GNU make, are released under
>> GNU FDL. May I know why Debian Free Software Guidelines considers it
>> non-free?
>>
>
> http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml
>
>
> I am not sure how current it is, but Manoj can clarify that. It is a
> rather poetic display of the clash between FSF's and Debian's
> interpretation of what freedom should be. :) Debian's points do matter,
> legally speaking, but if you take a step back and see what is
> happening, it sometimes makes you shake your head.
>

Aha, that's a huge explanation. I will surely invest a substantial amount
of time to understand what is being said there. There's a good story in
this.

However, I personally would beg to support the "outright banning DRM
mechanisms".

--Atanu

P.S. --> The Web page has links under the "Related Links: (provided by
Branden Robinson)" sections that lead to 404 Not Found on the server
messages. Can that be fixed please?


_______________________________________________
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/

Reply via email to