Point well taken and well put Len, I totally agree. Most of the spam we get is forged and now I am finding spammer using our domain names in their forgeries. I think SPF is a good idea at a minimum.
I do have a question for you though Len, off topic I guess. Is there anyway to get security patches for a NIX system more affordably than paying the higher cost of let's say Red Hat support agreements? I know nothing about NIX but tried Red Hat a while back. I found that I couldn't figure out how to keep getting security updates without buying the support which I probably should have anyway. We do have a NIX person that would help us with most issues so we probably don't need to but their sort of costly contract. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Len Conrad Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 3:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] A Quick Note from the Ipswitch Executive Team >It's also possible that spammers will also create a new SPF of their own >until they are caught them create another. However, unless I really don't >understand the dynamics of it all, at least SPF has the promise of getting >this spam issue under control a whole lot faster SPF is not anti-spam, it's anti-sender forgery Let me know when I can say: "no SPF records? then reject" Len _____________________________________________________________________ http://IMGate.MEIway.com : free anti-spam gateway, runs on 1000's of sites To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
