Laurent Blume wrote:
Ian Murdock a écrit :
I repeat: That's why we need OpenSolaris to be a binary distribution.
By "we", you mean "Sun".
But does the actual OpenSolaris community in its largest sense need a
distribution called OpenSolaris?
I'm part of the OpenSolaris community, obviously. I've been since its
inception, and in the Solaris one before.
I won't feel represented by a Sun internal project trying to take back
the reputation of what has been done by others, for its own PR purposes.
Well, we are having these rather fundamental discussions on an
OpenSolaris community list. And I cannot agree with your
characterisation of this project. I think it is about the next step in
growing the OpenSolaris community - (or do you consider that to be Sun's
PR?).
So, to your question, does the actual community need a distribution?
Clearly not - it already exists, it is the "actual community". We want
to consider the potential community.
Patrick
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
