Dear Vijayshankarji Nice reading the discussion. Few more points to add 1. How can we say that the new sps identifiedin Africa is not having relevance in Indian Context? Isnt it the world biodiversity we have to consider? In evolutionary links dont we take the geographical distribtion into consideration and try to give the evlutionay significance?Can we name differently the sps discovered in India than the same discovered in Africa? then we are not following the rules of Binomial nomenclature. For this the taxanomist in India must know the sps existing not only in Africa but in entire world. Then only new sps can be claimed. 2. As what mentioned International publications are having weightage not only to get jobs but to maintain jobs also. Even UGC has given different marks for International journal publications and Indian Journal publications in the new payscale, NAAC experts when visit college for accreditation look into these details too. 3. All the other difficulties faced by all who have written are true but in addition when we think of getting a copy of the paper Forien authors respond promptly to our mails or letters and many a times send the copy of their papers free, Indian many of the athors dont access mails, or dont respond to mails neither posts. So unless the journal is available online the publication remains hidden. 4. Many a time in Indian journals not only the one related taxanomy but other too. the journals are not peer reviewd. So the quality of journals also matters. Not that i have published many papers in International journals but when my students or colleuges send their papers these are the difficulties we face, If the paper is lying in one of the journals office for years togather and if someone else publish the paper on the same line who gets the credit? Tese are my few thoughts, No way i want to give higher credits to International publications but we have to improve, Madhuri -- On Thu, 16/6/11, Vijayasankar <vijay.botan...@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Vijayasankar <vijay.botan...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:71805] Re: TWO NEW SPECIES OF ERIOCAULON (ERIOCAULACEAE) FROM INDIA......!!! To: "H S" <hemsan...@gmail.com> Cc: "manudev madhavan" <manudevkmadha...@gmail.com>, "Ritesh Choudhary" <ritesh....@gmail.com>, "efloraofindia" <indiantreepix@googlegroups.com> Date: Thursday, 16 June, 2011, 11:50 AM Thank you all for your nice responses and opinion. Dear Ritesh, first of all I am not against publishing in intl. journals. The context here is very specific, about the relevance....and of course its my personal opinion only. Imagine a new species discovered in Africa or Europe getting published in an Indian journal. It may not be wrong....but what about the relevancy here. It may be searcheable in those journals, but what about accessible of full articles. And these impact factors are just to compare the efficiency of journals and not to judge the capability or knowledge of the author or the institution, i guess. How the impact factors matter in the field of taxonomy in India. I understand its importance in other fields such as chemistry etc. Impact factor is mainly based on number of documents and number of citable items published in a particular journal. If all scientists want to publish their high quality papers in foreign journals, how Indian journals will get citations and impact factors? Leave alone the money part... Is it not important what we publish...rather than where we publish?!... Thanks Manudev ji for taking this in a right spirit, and also for sharing your experience. Best wishes for all your future publications. [Please check with the journal's policy before circulating / sharing the pdf files. If it allows, I would like to read the paper, as I have published a new sp in Eriocaulon, too:) ]. Dear Pankaj, you are right. Sadly, two of my articles sent to one of the most reputed journals in India, were accepted for publication in 2005 and 2006 respectively, but they are not yet published. But the happy news is that the authorities are coming forward to make their journal online with free access to full articles. We have best examples for that. Hope to see much more positive developments in our Indian taxonomic journals par with their foreign counterparts. Thanks Usha ji, for supporting my view and also adding to the discussion. Regards Vijayasankar Raman National Center for Natural Products Research University of Mississippi On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:52 PM, H S <hemsan...@gmail.com> wrote: really good and needed discussion.. Vijay ji, Ritesh ji and Manudev ji thanx for your inputs.... regards, On 6/16/11, manudev madhavan <manudevkmadha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks to all... > > I am happy that my thread has lead the members to another discussion on > Indian journals. > Let me tell my experience.. > When I had attended few interviews, international papers where > much favored than those papers published in Indian journals there. > Let me tell you that our first priority was "the reachability of the > findings to the scientific community" when we tried to publish these. > Unfortunately none of our Indian taxonomy journals are available online( > except Nelumbo & & Rheedea..!!). > > Also I would like to add.. > I found it difficult to collect those papers published in Indian journals > than foreign journals during my literature survey. Still I am in search for > some papers published in some Indian journals from Bengal Botanical Society. > I couldn't even find a copy of them in CAL too. > when I wrote to the librarian of www.biodiversityheritagelibrary.org about > including Indian journals in their website, she told me that they do not > have much access to Indian Journals.. Anyway, I came to know that, all the > volumes of Rheedea will be available through biodiversityheritagelibrary > soon. > > I hope the scenario will be changed soon.. > > Anyway, Vijay ji, Ritesh ji, am considering an Indian journal for my next > paper, which is under progress..!!! > > For those who need the reprints of the paper, please drop me a mail.. > Am out of station now. Will be sending the reprint soon, when I am back to > my lab. > > with warm regards > > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Ritesh Choudhary <ritesh....@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Dear Vijay Anna! >> >> Little difference of opinion... >> >> I think publishing a new species in some foreign journal with good >> impact factor is not bad. They can be reached more easily to the >> scientific community than those published at the local level. Still >> most of the Indian plant taxonomy journals are not available online. >> You've to face a lot of trouble to find articles published in journals >> like Indian Forester, Indian Journal of Forestry or many more. >> Thankfully, Nelumbo (Bull. Bot. Surv. India) and Rheedea are available >> online for a couple of months but still they cannot be found under the >> SCI Index or other databases like Science Direct or Scopus. And as far >> as the payment to read an article is concerned....even the most >> popular Indian taxonomy journal JETB (J. Econ. Taxon. Bot.) is not >> available freely. >> >> But, yes,, I would be happy if somebody publishes the new >> distributional records or anything related in particular context to >> India to the Indian Journals. >> >> Hope u'll b agree (not angry ;-)) with my points. >> >> Best regards, >> Ritesh. >> > > > > -- > Manudev K Madhavan > Junior Research Fellow > Systematic & Floristic Lab, > Department of Botany, > Centre for Postgraduate Studies & Research > St. Joseph's College, Devagiri > Kozhikode- 673 008 > Mob: 9496470738 > > -- - H.S. A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a mere heart of stone
<<330.gif>>
