Gurcharan ji,

   Here is plant no.3 i.e. Convolvulus scindicus Stocks. Local name
:Kaland.

:The plant though very closely related to C. microphyllus can easily be
distinguished from the latter by its erect rigid habit and hirsute
branches.

Source: Bhandari sir's flora.

He gifted me a copy of this flora after Ahmedabad meeting with his
signature and comment. It is valuable asset.

So these are three different species. I am Agronomist by education not
Taxonomist but expecting from Taxonomists to publish one more
paper challenging the paper from Pakistan.

regards

Pankaj Oudhia



On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote:

> Let us hope it gets resolved soon:
> Three disctinct species Convolvulus scindicus, Ipomoea sindica (in this
> case Stapf should have given a description different from first species)
> and Ipomoea eriocarpa
> or only two species Convolvulus scindicus (syn: ipomoea sindica) and
> Ipomoea eriocarpa
>
> If any one can hold of original publication of Stapf, the problem can get
> solved.
>
> --
> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> Retired  Associate Professor
> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Pankaj Oudhia <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> At that time I was not having good camera like Dsc P-120 or at present
>> Sony HX-1. I can draw but not good artist like Pankaj Kumar Sahani ji.
>>
>> I am confident that pictures must be in FRLHT's database. Also in
>> Bhandari sir's flora colored plates are there. Line diagrams are also
>> there. And foremost Bhandari sir is with us.
>>
>> regards
>>
>> Pankaj Oudhia
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Pankaj ji
>>> It is good that you have seen all: Ipomoea sindica (if it different from
>>> Convolvulus scindicus), Ipomoea eriocarpa as also Convolvulus scindcus
>>>  (since Convolvulus scindicus appears in one of your publications). If you
>>> could upload all (or provide links to their photographs) our problem would
>>> be solved.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Pankaj Oudhia 
>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Fortunately I have seen both species and discussed on it with Bhandari
>>>> sir. The occasion was the event by National Innovation Foundation and as
>>>> Advisory Research Committee Members myself, Bhandari sir, Dr.Darshan
>>>> Shankar of FRLHT and Dr. Puspagadan were discussing the entries of the
>>>> Traditional experts for award.
>>>>
>>>> Ipomoea sindica is annual with 4 seeds.
>>>>
>>>> Just to add
>>>>
>>>> Everything is not published, Everything is not in internet and also
>>>> Everything on internet is not authentic, PLUS every thing published in
>>>> science journals are not ultimate. Science is dynamic not static.
>>>>
>>>> Peer reviewed papers are seen by 10-15 reviewers but discussions in
>>>> Efloraindia are seen by thousands of reviewers up to many decades. Hence,
>>>> there is need to reconsider the "Peer-review mania" present in few
>>>> researchers.
>>>>
>>>> Lets wait for the comments of other members.
>>>>
>>>> regards
>>>>
>>>> Pankaj Oudhia
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> yes Pankaj ji
>>>>> It is this Ipomoea sindica Stapf, which I had mentioned in my two
>>>>> communications and which according to Flora of Pakistan cited by me above
>>>>> is now correctly known as Convolvulus scindicus Stocks. Please Remember
>>>>> Stapf did not describe a new plant, he merely gave a combination Ipomoea
>>>>> sindica (dropping c). The species is now considered belonging to genus
>>>>> Convolvulus.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't have Flora of Indian Desert by M M Bhandari, but have hard
>>>>> copy of Flora of W Pakistan published in 1979, which also considers 
>>>>> Ipomoea
>>>>> sindica (Stocks) Stapf as synonym of Convolvulus scindicus Stocks.
>>>>>    Perhaps this comparison between Convolvulus scindicus and Ipomoea
>>>>> eriocarpa should help to resolve the issue
>>>>>
>>>>> Convolvulus
>>>>> scindicus                                                      Ipomoea
>>>>> eriocarpa
>>>>> 1. Shrub or
>>>>> undershrub                                                    1. Plant a
>>>>> twinning herb or prostrate
>>>>> 2. Leaves 5-10 mm long, sessile, succulent.                     2.
>>>>> Leaves 25-90 mm long, petiole almost as long as blade, not succulent
>>>>> 3. Leaf base not cordate at base, margin undulate.            3. Leaf
>>>>> cordate at base, margin not undulate.
>>>>> 4. Corolla c. 12 mm
>>>>> long.                                                4. Corolla 7-9 mm 
>>>>> long.
>>>>> 5. Ovary (obviously capsule) glabrous.                              5.
>>>>> Capsule pubescent
>>>>> 6. Seed
>>>>> one                                                                   6.
>>>>> Seeds more than one
>>>>> 7. Stigma
>>>>> filiform                                                            7.
>>>>> Stigma globose
>>>>>
>>>>> Frankly I have not seen any of these two but my conclusions are based
>>>>> on published information. Perhaps you can go through the description given
>>>>> in Flora of Indian Desert to arrive at the conclusion of which is
>>>>> intended.If it matches the second, then perhaps some thing is wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>>   Gurcharan Singh
>>>>>  On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Pankaj Oudhia <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ipomoea sindica Staph. in Kew Bull. 93; I.1894; Prain in Journ.
>>>>>> Asi.Soc. Beng. 65: pt.2. 537. 1896; FPB. 2:313; BH. 26(2); 546. 1919 
>>>>>> (Type
>>>>>> Stapf, CAL 311725)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Source: The Flora of the Indian Desert, MM Bhandari, MPS Repros,
>>>>>> Jodhpur, India. Revised Edition 1990.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pankaj Oudhia
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Gurcharan Singh 
>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pankaj  ji
>>>>>>> I fail to understand your sudden outburst is directed against whom?,
>>>>>>> we had long forgotten such things and luckily our present group 
>>>>>>> believes on
>>>>>>> facts evidenced by literature references and not personal preferences.
>>>>>>>    I request you to Google search for Ipomoea sindica to know the
>>>>>>> facts. Also go through the following links to decide for yourself:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://efloras.org/browse.aspx?flora_id=0&name_str=Ipomoea+sindica&btnSearch=Search
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=250096915
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=200018847
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://plants.jstor.org/flora/fwta6445
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://ecoport.org/ep?SearchType=reference&ReferenceID=216502
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would be happy to know if Ipomoea sindica really exists. Could you
>>>>>>> kindly give the full reference and author associated with the name and
>>>>>>> taxonomic resource.
>>>>>>>  .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>>>>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>>>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>>>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>>>>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>>>>>> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
>>>>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   * *
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Pankaj Oudhia <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just consulted FRLHT database where both species are dealt
>>>>>>>> separately. May be Vijayashankar ji can throw more light on it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://envis.frlht.org/bot_search.php
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Pankaj Oudhia
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Pankaj Oudhia <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Capsule Glabrous; seeds glabrous - Ipomoea sindica
>>>>>>>>> Capsule hispid; seeds glabrous  - Ipomoea eriocarpa
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ipomoea eriocarpa syn. Ipomoea hispida, Convolvulus hispidus.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is one of the very early flowering plants; when it is only
>>>>>>>>> 2-3 leaved, it bears flowers. It is more common than closely related
>>>>>>>>> Ipomoea eriocarpa R.Br.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -From Field Notes of Bhandari sir.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately our group is hijacked by single minded expert not
>>>>>>>>> ready to consider others. It is harmful to both group and science of
>>>>>>>>> taxonomy. We must know that it is not the classroom. This attitude of
>>>>>>>>> dominance is forcing lots of members to keep distance with the group.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Bhandari sir is with us and we can invite him to the group anytime
>>>>>>>>> for clarification.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> regards
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Pankaj Oudhia
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Tabish <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dear Gurcharan ji,
>>>>>>>>>>    Sorry, I had missed your earlier post. Thanks for the
>>>>>>>>>> explanation. I was indeed unaware of Convolvolvulus scindicus Stocks.
>>>>>>>>>>     Best wishes
>>>>>>>>>>     - Tabish
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 3:36:19 PM UTC+5:30, Gurcharan Singh
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Tabish ji
>>>>>>>>>>> Not the real Ipomoea sindica Satpf. which is now correctly known
>>>>>>>>>>> as Convolvolvulus scindicus Stocks
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The Ipomoea sindica wrongly identified by Jafri in Flora of
>>>>>>>>>>> Karachi and several authors is Ipomoea eriocarpa as explained by me 
>>>>>>>>>>> above.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>>>>>>>>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>>>>>>>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>>>>>>>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>>>>>>>>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.gurcharanfamily.**com/<http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~**singhg45/<http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Pankaj Oudhia <
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Tabish ji. In Flora of the Indian Desert by
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dr.M.M.Bhandari, Ipomoea sindica is treated as entirely different 
>>>>>>>>>>>> species
>>>>>>>>>>>> to Ipomoea eriocarpa. Line diagrams of both species are there and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> it is
>>>>>>>>>>>> mentioned that Ipomoea sindica is endemic to Sindh and Rajasthan 
>>>>>>>>>>>> whereas
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ipomoea eriocarpa is present throughout India and also reported in 
>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>> countries.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Just to add -Indian Traditional Healers specially from
>>>>>>>>>>>> Rajasthan treat both species as different species as far as 
>>>>>>>>>>>> medicinal
>>>>>>>>>>>> properties are concerned.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Pankaj Oudhia
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Tabish <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The plant which was called Ipomoea sindica, is now known as 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> **<http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=200018847>Ipomoea
>>>>>>>>>>>>> eriocarpa.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  http://www.efloras.org/**florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&**
>>>>>>>>>>>>> taxon_id=250096917<http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=250096917>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  http://www.flowersofindia.**net/catalog/slides/Tiny%**
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20Morning%20Glory.html<http://www.flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/Tiny%20Morning%20Glory.html>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>   - Tabish
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------**-------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.flowersofindia.net
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The waterhole of flower lovers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 12:38 PM, jmgarg1 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Balkar ji,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Didn't find any species named Ipomoea sindica on google
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> search.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pl. check & let us know.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 24 September 2010 06:49, Balkar Arya <[email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear All
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ipomoea sindica
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Pls correct me if i am wrong)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dr Balkar Singh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Head, Deptt. of Botany and Biotechnology
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arya P G College, Panipat
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Haryana-132103
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 09416262964
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dr Balkar Singh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Head, Deptt. of Botany and Biotechnology
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arya P G College, Panipat
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Haryana-132103
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 09416262964
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> J.M.Garg ([email protected])
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**User:Jmgarg1<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a *thousand
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> species* & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plants etc. (arranged alphabetically & place-wise):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://commons.wikimedia.org/**wiki/Category:J.M.Garg<http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg>.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  You
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can also use them for free as per Creative Commons license 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attached
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with each image.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Indian Flora, please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e-group:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.co.in/**group/indiantreepix<http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix>(more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  than 1820 members & 1,10,000 messages on 29/2/12) or 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Efloraofindia
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> website: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://sites.google.com/site/**efloraofindia/<https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  (with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a species database of more than 6000 species).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Birds of India'.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> x
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to