Margaret, > I do support the charter, but I have some concern about the milestone > list... > > I think it would make sense to get consensus in the intarea WG that > these items should be adopted as WG work items before adding them to > the milestone list, just as we would with new items that are > introduced in the future.
That's the idea. The list contained three items. Two (IPID, tunnel) have been worked on by the group for some time. I think we have asked the group about the interest to work on these, but given that we were not operating as a working group the decision has not been as visible as it would have in a working group. For instance, the draft name has not changed. The third item (SEAL) is currently something that we are considering adopting. Again, if we were a working group the process would be much clearer. And now I realize that the list is missing one item -- we've been working on the ICMP unnumbered extensions which were returned to INTAREA after significant IESG review comments. In any case, we will make sure that there is an agreement to work on every item in the list, either in the form of an earlier informal decision (IPID, tunnel, unnumbered) or a new decision (SEAL). Does that satisfy your concern? Jari _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
