Hi, On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 11:40 -0800, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > > currently the users seem to live quite good with the licenses granted by > > the PHP License 3.01. > > "Quite good" can be always made better. For example, you may claim PDO > is perfect and doesn't need any help from DB vendors, and some may claim > it misses some useful features and help from the people that actually > make the databases would be great.
Wait, in the part I quoted, the one you dropped you said: | As far as I understand, the purpose of the CLA usually is to make | reasonable assurance for the user that the code in the project is | safe to use So you were talking about the purpose was making the user's life "safer", now you say that DB vendors need a CLA for contribution. Sorry, now I'm confused. And btw. the mentioned companies, even IBM, seem to be able to contribute without a CLA (with tests and even a few fixes for the engine...) > > But: Before discussing some random CLAs and such stuff it would be imo > > good if this group, disucussing PDO, could share their plans - then we > > could discuss on facts not assumptions, rumors, ... > > It would be indeed. Let's hope it will happen soon. In the meantime, I'm > trying to help what I can :) I hope this comes soon and enlightens me since Im really confused now. johannes -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php