On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 13:33 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote: > On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 19:21 +0100, Stefan Priebsch wrote: > > Sam Barrow schrieb: > > > Keep in mind that your "do_whatever" would actually be a trigger error > > > with an error message including the name of the function and parameter > > > number. > > > > I did not make the point of my code clear enough. do_whatever is not the > > code that triggers the error, but the code that handles the error. > > > > My point is that I think people will start checking parameters before > > they call a function to avoid a fatal error. This is more code and > > uglier, because you'll have to repeat it for every function call, > > instead of once in the function body. > > > > Even if they put an explicit typecast into a function call, like > > foo((int) $something) error handling code would have to be provided in > > case the cast was not possible. > > This is an optional feature. It's MY library, why can I not force > consumers of the API to use it how I, the developer, think it should be > used? > > The onus should be on consumers of my API to use it properly, not on me > to jump through hoops to make sure they gave me the correct data at > every step of the way. I stopped holding hands in grade 3 or so.
True. It would also keep the APIs more tightly integrated, and interaction less prone to type errors. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
