On 28 January 2013 14:49, Alan Knowles <a...@roojs.com> wrote: > I was trying to vote against, for what it's worth. > > It's a major bc break with no obvious value, and what appears to be 7 days > given to vote when every one is busy discussing a new property syntax. >
See other thread by Zeev :) On 20 January 2013 19:17, Gustavo Lopes <glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt> wrote: > I've opened the vote for the "remove calls from incompatible context" RFC: > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/incompat_ctx#vote > Gustavo, it's probably a good idea in future to be a little more verbose about the content of an RFC. The original mail didn't really give much context with what was being proposed, so was easily skimmed over I guess. That said, it *was* announced through the correct channels, and if you see and RFC and don't know what it's about, all you have to do is click it and see. On 28 January 2013 14:17, Alan Knowles <a...@roojs.com> wrote: > But this is a core php feature, for anyone who does not use traits.... We > use this quite a bit, it may not be for purists, but it has worked > perfectly for years. This is getting a bit silly, change for change sake.... > > So your code has been generating errors since 2006 and you didn't think to fix it? E_STRICT is an error just like any other. Ok, probably shouldn't start a discussion about this, but it was my first thought.
