Hi! > Does anyone object to any of those words ?
Yes. I do not think precommitting to implement anything that has been put on wiki and passed the vote is a good thing. Its a good conflict resolution mechanism when we're talking about where or not to implement certain technical feature. But IMO it would be terrible as a sole governance mechanism for the whole project. > Do we need to vote on changing the introduction (I'm happy to start an rfc > for this, if necessary) ? I don't think RFCs were meant to essentially remake all project governance structure. They were meant for solving technical questions, not governance model. I am not sure which way would be the best (haven't thought about it) but certainly neither just putting some words on wiki nor voting on it within the RFC process looks like a good way to do it. -- Stas Malyshev smalys...@gmail.com -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
