John, > My understanding of this entire discussion was that the "bit method" > was more along these lines: > > 1. Addresses for which something stronger than Return Routability > is needed. > > 2. Addresses for which Return Routability is sufficient.
It originally certainly was. However, at least my thinking has evolved since then. That is, it *may* be possible, perhaps, to solve the RR bidding down issue separately. We still don't know. I'll let Jari's reply to stand for the rest. --Pekka Nikander -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
