Nick, Have you tested hmipv6 to the scale that mobility operator working with ISPs can cover the entire metropolis of L.A.?
If your saying these tests can support moving a draft to PS I agree. But I would have agreed to moving hpmipv6 to PS last year. No one has deployed layer 3 in production environment I am aware of? Nor would I trust it yet simply because of this mail discussion. I will do technical detailed implementation analysis of James's draft and have asked mobile node comrades to test it. But I am tired of chasing ghosts in the IETF but I will yet one more time. Thanks /jim -----Original Message----- From: Nick 'Sharkey' Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 6:46 PM To: Bound, Jim Cc: Alper E. YEGIN; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Pekka Savola; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Optimistic DAD draft ... On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:18:52AM -0400, Bound, Jim wrote: > Alper, > > None of us working on this are even clear layer 3 handover will ever > work? Not sure if that matters does it? Are we talking about the > future? We're pretty clear on this: we've tested it. The significant delays are: * 100-1000ms Network RTT for binding updates (FIX: hmipv6, etc) * 1000ms DAD timeout delay (FIX: Optimistic DAD, etc) * 200ms+ L2 handover delay (argh!) ----N -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
