On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 11:23:25AM +0200, Hesham Soliman (EAB) wrote: > > > For example, hmipv6 offers one possible way of eliminating the RTT > > delay caused by sending BUs. In its current form, it probably > > isn't scalable to that level, > > => Why not? I think it is scalable to that level simply > because you can plug more anchor points as you see > fit. it's as scalable as HAs are in MIPv6.
My main concern would be issues to do with the MAP information propagation, and the MAP selection algorithm ... I think there's some common ground between the tactics of HMIP and the FMIP three-party-handover and I suspect the best solution is in that region somewhere ... > => What you're doing (optimistic DAD) can be combined > with Fast Handovers to completely eliminate movement > detection delay. [...] > => My very initial effort (with Karim) with Fast handovers was aimed > at: anticipation + optimistic DAD + HMIPv6. It's tricky getting anticipation signalling out of most 802.11 drivers, but we've had success getting L2 to signal L3 that it has just reassociated, causing L3 to RS. Greg Daley has more information here, I'm sure he'll chip in when he gets back to town ... -----N -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
