> Optimistic DAD is a useful optimization because DAD is far more > likely to succeed than fail, by a factor of at least > 10,000,000,000 > to one[SOTO]. This makes it worth a little disruption > in the failure > case to provide faster handovers in the successful case, > as long as > the disruption is recoverable. > > ==> this is totally, and completely wrong. [SOTO] only > provide analysis > in *some* cases, in particular autoconfigured vs privacy > addresses. For > manually assigned addresses, I believe the ratio is closer > to 1:10 or > 1:100 (unmeasurable, of course).
=> I think that manually configuring a CoA is not something we should do or talk about in standards. So it is probably not important to include it in any useful (useable) statistics on the probability of address duplication. Hesham -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
