> => what I propose is not pure per-process control, it is to put the > control in the context of processes. It gives immediatly a per-process > control but with a way to manage the context from applications, it gives > a per-socket control too.
Francis, I didn't understand how the per-process context also gives you per-socket control. Are you considering having setsockopts in addition to per-process context controls? Or are you arguing that the setsockopt type of control is not necessary? Erik -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
