At 10:15 AM 10/21/2003 -0400, Suresh Krishnan wrote: >>You are wrong :) They tasted the filth of being behind NAT's >>and not being able to do a number of things including VoIP. > >I am no NAT apologist but I do not think this is entirely true. Skype runs >amazingly well behind NATs. As long as NAT is an option people will find >ways to twist applications to work with it. It is the application >developer who feels the pain. Not the end user.
But if I want a VoIP communication from me (behind a NAT) to some user behind a NAT, not using a 3rd party "location" server, how does v4 deliver, without the receiving user having the pain of port forwarding configuration on their NAT? How do I do the same in v4 where I want end-to-end encryption on the application? Tim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
