IMHO, "private" is appropriate. As noted in other emails, "organization" is bit too specific. Plus, "Private (IPv4) addresses" is a well known concept, and it would simpler for IPv4 network (home, organization, etc networks) operators to extend the same understanding to IPv6.
CP On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:52:46 +0100, "Brian E Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > How about simply calling whatever we end up with "organizational > addresses"? I think that captures it much better than "local", "site > local", "private" or whatever. > > Brian > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
