On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote: > so proposed change: the last part should be changed to "the interface > address SHOULD be disabled". (add "address")
If we say something to this effect (i.e., the address), I believe it should be a MUST. There is really zero excuse to continue using an address if DAD fails. On the other hand, there may be some reasons for continuing to use the interface. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
