Hi all,

>  > As I just said in a separate message, one big question had been raised
>  > about rfc2462bis.  It was, in my understanding, 
> 
> => The question you raise affects 2461 and as a consequence it affects 2462.
> FWIW, I really think that there is no point in going round and round again
> in this discussion when there is no harm done by keeping them. 
> Removing them is not backward compatible for 2461 anyway. 
> So I recommend we leave them as defined.

I agree with Hesham.  Unless they are doing harm, I don't think they should be removed
& create compatability problems.

John

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to