All, I believe that it is entirely too late in the life of this protocol to be removing these bits. If there is in fact confusion over their usage then the usage should be clarified. The original intent of this revision was to clarify portions of the specification which were not clear, not to open every feature for the full-scale debate and revision. There is running, shipping code that makes use of these bits. What, exactly, is the upside in breaking that code? Tim Hartrick Mentat Inc. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whet... Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [rfc2462bis] ... Alain Durand
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we ne... Tim Chown
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether w... Alain Durand
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we ne... Christian Strauf (JOIN)
- RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O fl... Soliman Hesham
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O fl... john . loughney
- RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O fl... Soliman Hesham
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M... Vijayabhaskar A K
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O fl... Tim Hartrick
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M... Alain Durand
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need t... Tim Hartrick
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we ne... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we ne... Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O fl... Soliman Hesham
- RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O fl... Soliman Hesham
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O fl... john . loughney
- RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O fl... Soliman Hesham