Hi Jinmei, > Now let's think about cons of deprecating these flags. > > The obvious one is that this action may break existing > implementations. In fact, this is the most typical objection I've > seen in this thread. I'd like to withdraw my original objection to this. I had a chance to discuss with the guys who implemented some IPv6 stacks internally & deprecating the flags won't break the implementations. John -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M... Vijayabhaskar A K
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O fl... Tim Hartrick
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M... Alain Durand
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need t... Tim Hartrick
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we ne... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we ne... Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O fl... Soliman Hesham
- RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O fl... Soliman Hesham
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O fl... john . loughney
- RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O fl... Soliman Hesham
- RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O fl... Christian Huitema
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need t... Brian Haberman
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we ne... Alain Durand
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whether w... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: [rfc2462bis] whet... Alain Durand
- Re: [rfc2462bis] ... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: [rfc2462bis] ... Brian Haberman
- Re: [rfc2462bis] ... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉