Kurtis Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Bob Hinden wrote:
> > New or updated implementations are not required to support this > > address type. Existing implementations and deployments may continue > > to use these addresses. > > Shouldn't we be a bit more explicit on what routers/hosts should do with > these addresses when found? We're already allowing for multiple behaviours. Being more explicit (about what those behaviours are) could be more confusing than helpful. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
