On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Brian Haberman wrote:
Issue 1: Restrict operation of the protocol to link-local use.

Resolution:
    The consensus is to retain the more flexible multi-hop capability.
    An additional sentence or two will be added to the Security
    Considerations section recommending the filtering of these
     messages at administrative boundaries.

I did not see such consensus. I saw about 5 people agreeing to the (by-default) limitation, and one person (Alain Durand) opposed. Rather, to me, it seemed like rough consensus to make the change. Did I miss something?

--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to