Brian, Give the heat this proposal is generating (at least in the ARIN region) it does not seem very constructive to tackle this issue in a sleeping working group that is not meeting face to face.
- Alain. > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Haberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 3:27 PM > To: Ipv > Subject: Revising Centrally Assigned ULA draft > > All, > There has been recent activity in the Registry Community > looking at policies utilizing the Centrally Assigned ULA > specification that has expired. Several people with ties to > both the IETF and the RIRs have been working with the authors > to revise the specification in order to meet the needs of the > policy proposals in the RIRs. > > Given that the previous work on Centrally Assigned ULAs > was adopted as an IPv6 WG document, the chairs feel that this > upcoming revision should be considered a continuation of that work. > > The chairs highly encourage people interested in this > work to review and comment on the upcoming revision when it > is published. > > As a note, Bob will be the responsible editor for this > document and Brian will be the shepherding WG chair. > > Regards, > Brian and Bob > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
