ARIN & NANOG are nothing more than heat lately (all hot air?). As I
suggested at NANOG this week, the right thing to do is for the WG to define
the space, and turn it over to IANA to manage. Beyond that it was all policy
anyway, so the fact that it is defined makes no difference if policy chooses
to ignore it. Not defining it leaves policy with no alternative but to
succumb to those that want nothing more than to exercise power through
control of the address space.

I say wrap it up and ship it. 
Tony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Durand, Alain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 1:17 PM
> To: Brian Haberman; Ipv
> Subject: RE: Revising Centrally Assigned ULA draft
> 
> Brian,
> 
> Give the heat this proposal is generating (at least in the ARIN region)
> it does not seem very constructive to tackle this issue
> in a sleeping working group that is not meeting face to face.
> 
>    - Alain.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brian Haberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 3:27 PM
> > To: Ipv
> > Subject: Revising Centrally Assigned ULA draft
> >
> > All,
> >      There has been recent activity in the Registry Community
> > looking at policies utilizing the Centrally Assigned ULA
> > specification that has expired.  Several people with ties to
> > both the IETF and the RIRs have been working with the authors
> > to revise the specification in order to meet the needs of the
> > policy proposals in the RIRs.
> >
> >      Given that the previous work on Centrally Assigned ULAs
> > was adopted as an IPv6 WG document, the chairs feel that this
> > upcoming revision should be considered a continuation of that work.
> >
> >      The chairs highly encourage people interested in this
> > work to review and comment on the upcoming revision when it
> > is published.
> >
> >      As a note, Bob will be the responsible editor for this
> > document and Brian will be the shepherding WG chair.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Brian and Bob
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> > ipv6@ietf.org
> > Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to